Return to D.S. Campbell's home page
Recapitulation of Citation Styles
for U.S. Laws
(Revised August, 1998)
The most respected authority for citation styles in the United States is A Uniform System of Citation (USOC), published jointly by the laws reviews at Columbia, Harvard, Penn & Yale. Although this web cite is based on the fiftheenth edtion, the sixteenth came out in 1998.
Citing Case Law
The Bluebook asserts that the styles used for citing in a law journal are differernt from those used for citing in a legal memorandum or in a document designed to be submitted to a court. The discussion below is based on submissions to a scholarly journal. At times, however, differences for citing in memoranda and court documents will be pointed out. In addition, the Bluebook states that citations to a court receiving a document are are different form citations to a court that does not receive it. The difference usually is slight. The citation to the court receiving the document, whenever possible, includes not only a regional reporter, but also the official reporter of that state. Although the Bluebook rarely gives a reason for its rules, it seems reasonable to suggest that, since courts receiving a document may not have access to the state reporter of a court that does not receive the document, citing a state reporter of a court not receiving the document be of little, if any, use to the court that does receive it. Finally, the Bluebook lists rules for citing textual sentences and phrases.
Elements of a full case citation: (1) name of case with v. [abbreviation for versus, i.e., against] between the parties; (2) volume number of reporter; (3) abbreviated name of reporter; (4) page number cited case begins on; (5) parenthetical material consists of (a) year decision issued and (b) when not apparent from name of reporter the name of court issuing decision; (6) subsequent history, if any, of the case. Give prior history only if important to the point being discussed or if not giving it fails to described the issue sufficiently. If including parallel citations, then list official reporter first. Subsequent citations use a short form described later in this document.
·
Illustrative full citation of a federal district court decision that was appealed to the United States Supreme Court.Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 384 F. Supp. 954 (M.D. Pa. 1972),
aff'd, 483 F.2d. 754 (3d Cir. 1973), aff'd, 419 U.S. 345 (1974).
·
Illustrative citation of an official United States Supreme Court Reporter decision:Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 (1986).
Parker v. U.S., 402 U.S. 634, 639 (Stevens, J. dissenting)
·
Illustrative citation of a U.S. Supreme Court Reporter decision with parallel nominative:Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
Nominatives
Name No. Dates U.S. No.
Dallas 1-4 1790-1800 1-4
Cranch 1-9 1801-1815 5-13
Wheaton 1-12 1816-1827 14-25
Peters 1-16 1828-1842 26-41
Howard 1-24 1843-1860 42-65
Black 1-2 1861-1862 66-67
Wallace 1-23 1863-1874 68-90
·
Citing official United States Supreme Court reporter with unofficial reporter parallels:S.Ct. is the abbreviation for an unofficial reporter published by West Company and entitled Supreme Court Reporter. L.Ed. is the abbreviation for an unofficial reporter published by the Lawyer's Cooperative and entitled Supreme Court Reporter, Lawyer's Edition; a second series, which began in 1952, is abbreviated L.Ed.2d. Supreme Court Reporter begins with volume 106 of U.S. Reports. Supreme Court Reporter, Lawyer's Edition covers the period from 1791 to the present. Unofficial reporters use star paging, which superimposes the official pagination on the text of the unofficial reporter by using marginal or parenthetical references. In Table 1, the Bluebook, apparently capriciously, forbids parallel citations to federal courts. Since researchers of court cases often do not have official reportes available, it seems only a common courtesy to include parallel citations to unofficial reporters.
·
Illustrative citation of a U. S. Supreme Court decision with parallel reporters:Abrams
v. United States , 250 U.S. 616, 63 L.Ed. 1173, 40 S.Ct. 17 (1919).·
Illustrative citation of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit:Ramseur v. Beyer, 983 F.2d 1215 (3d Cir. 1992).
·
Illustrative citation of a United States District Court for the Western District of PennsylvaniaAnthony v. Sullivan, 802 F. Supp. 1317 (W.D. Pa. 1992).
Eastern District cited similarly (E.D.Pa. 1992).
and Middle District cited (M.D.Pa. 1992).
·
Illustrative citation of a Administrative Decision (National Labor Relations Board):Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., 91 N.L.R.B. 544 (1950).
·
Illustrative citation of a Opinion by an Attorney General:40 Op. Att'y Gen. 423 (1945).
The National Reporter System, by West, comprises seven regional reporters for state appellate courts. Atlantic Reporter (cited A. or A.2d) Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont;
|
North Eastern Reporter (cited N.E. or N.E.2d) |
North Western Reporter (cited N.W. or N.W.2d) |
|
Pacific Reporter (cited P. or P.2d) |
South Eastern Reporter (cited S.E. or S.E.2d) |
|
South Western Reporter (cited S.W. or S.W.2d) |
Southern Reporter (cited So. or So.2d) |
Terms Helpful in Reading Case Law
|
Court Decision |
Usually quite brief, a court's decision, narrowly conceived, is its ruling or disposition of the case. Among the most common terms for disposition are these: affirmed, reversed, remanded, or dismissed. |
|
Court Opinion |
More broadly conceived, the opinion consists of explanatory comments comprising the holding, rationale, and dicta. |
|
Majority Opinion |
Issued by the majority of justices, but written by only one, the majority opinion, of which there can be only one, is the controlling opinion and its holding may be cited as precedent. |
|
Concurring Opinion |
Issued by one or more justices, but written by only one, a concurring opinion, agrees with the result, but not the reasoning, of the majority. There may be more than one concurring opinion for a single case and each justice may join more than one concurring opinion. |
|
Dissenting Opinion |
Issued by one or more justices, but written by only one, a dissenting opinion disagrees with both the result and the reasoning of the majority opinion. There may be more than one dissenting opinion for a single case and each justice may join more than one dissenting opinion. |
|
Per Curiam Opinion |
Because a per curiam opinion constitutes the opinion of the entire court, the writer is not identified, but is conceived of in the aggregate. |
|
En Banc |
Although en banc means that every justice, rather than simply an acceptable quorum, participated in the case, it does not mean they all agreed. Thus, if nine justices make up the court, then all nine must participate in the decision, even though seven or eight may constitute an acceptable quorum. |
|
Memorandum |
Memoranda are so brief at times, often a single word, they are not always thought of an opinion at all, but merely a decision. |
|
De Novo |
Latin for anew, de novo means the case is tried in the appellate court as if it had not been tried previously. Often the lower court is not a court of record, such as a small claims court. |
|
On the Record |
When a case is reviewed on the record--meaning only the record is considered and not such items like new testimony which would be part of de novo--the appellate court give deference to the lower court's finding of facts, but reviews the findings of law with great scrutiny and without deference. An independent assessment of facts will be asserted only if the lower court's findings were "arbitrary or capricious." |
|
De Novo |
Although the appellate court must base its decision on the record, it may reach an conclusion about the facts different from the lower court it the trial court's findings are clearly erroneous. |
Citing Case Law
[Bluebook rule 10]A full citation to a case includes the following elements:
Examples: A Maryland federal district court case that was upheld on appeal by the federal court of appeals in the fourth circuit.
Adams v. Butler
, 418 F. Supp. 290 (D.Md. 1974), aff'd, 347 F.2d 589 (4th Cir. 1975).A Maryland court of special appeals decision that was upheld on appeal first by the Maryland Supreme Court and later by the United State Supreme Court. Citation is for a document not submitted to a Maryland Court.
Carter v. Davis
, 222 A.2d 628 (Md. App. 1977), aff'd, 245 A.2d 804 (Md. 1978), aff'd, 179 U.S. 415 (1978).Same case for a document submitted to a Maryland court.
Carter v. Davis
, 134 Md. App. 163, 222 A.2d 628 (1977), aff'd, 325 Md. 122, 245 A.2d 804 (1978), aff'd, 179 U.S. 415 (1978).A federal district case from the District of Columbia that was upheld on appeal first by the appeals court of the District of Columbia circuit and later by the United State Supreme Court.
Palmer v. Stewart
, 581 F. Supp. 918 (D.D.C.), aff'd, 620 F.2d 34 (D.C. Cir. 1988), aff'd, 219 S.Ct. 780 (1990).Short forms: A shorten citation form may be used for cases previously cited in full. The Bluebook accepts four forms. Note that, when the name of the reporter is used in a subsequent reference, it is not necessary to include both the page number of the first page of the case and the number of the page in which the words being documented are printed. The word "at" indicates a pin point cite. Although acceptable, id should be avoided because it provides a dearth of information. Indeed, use any shortened form only if it clearly identifies the case being cited. When mentioning a general reference to a case previously cited in full, it is acceptable to refer to it only by the name of one party. For example, "The issue in Calandra is settled."
United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. at 343.
Calandra, 414 U.S. at 343
414 U.S. at 343
id. at 343
Citing Statutes
Citing Statutory Codes:
[Bluebook rule 12.3 ]If Congress goes through all the statutes in a particular title and formally declares that all of them are valid and accurate, then that title has been enacted into positive law. You can rely exclusively on the language of such statutes even if the language is different from the statute as it originally appeared in Statutes at Large. Otherwise, the official Statutes at Large contains the authoritative law, not the official codes. At the beginning of the first volume of U.S.C., a note reveals which titles have been enacted into positive law. Statutes are binding and mandatory in their own jurisdictions, but not even persuasive outside.
The United States Code is republished every six years; between editions, yearly hardbound supplements are issued. Unofficial annotated codes are supplemented three times a year by cumulative pocket parts and monthly by West's United States Code Congressional and Administrative News (U.S.C.C.A.N.) and Lawyer's Cooperative's Advance Service
When citing a code, give a statute's name and original section number only if the statute is commonly cited that way or if the information would aid in identification. An official name, a popular name, or both may be used. Ordinarily cite to current official code (U.S.C.) or its supplement. (If a title has not been enacted into positive law, however, then you should also cite parallel session law. If a statute is popularly referred to by its titles in statutes at large, then you should also cite session law, not the code. For more guidance on when to cite statutes at large see the section below on citing session law.) Otherwise, cite (a) to a current unofficial code or its supplement (U.S.C.A. or U.S.C.S.), or (b) to official session laws. The year in a code citation is the year of the code, not the year the statute being cited was passed. Therefore, use--in order of preference--one of the following dates: date on spine of the code volume, date on title page, latest copyright year. If more than one year is given, use the entire span. If citing a supplement or pocket part, then cite the date that appears on its title page. If none, give its copyright date.
Citing the Federal Code
You may cite an unofficial code when the sections you wish to cite have been revised so recently they have not yet been printed in a supplement to the official code.
Citing the Federal Code with Supplement
5. Within parentheses at the end of a citation, place the following information:
A. year of code followed by a space;
B. ampersand followed by a space;
C. Supp. followed by a space;
D. year of supplement.
6. If the supplement is from an unofficial code, then you must put the name of the publisher in the parentheses.
18 U.S.C.A. § 485 (West 1988 & Supp. 1990).
18 U.S.C.S. § 485 (Law. Co-op. 1988 & Supp. 1990).
42 U.S.C.A. § 300a-7 (West Supp. 1991).
42 U.S.C.S. § 300a-7 (Law. Co-op. Supp. 1991).
Citing Statutory Session Law:
[Bluebook rule 12.4]You should cite session law if a statutes is broken into several parts and placed in many widely-separated locations when inserted into a code. Such a cite also should include a parenthetical reference to the general location of the codified section.
You must cite session law if the statute does not appear in a code. A statute may not appear in the code for several reasons, but two are most common. First, the law being cited is a private law. Secondly, the statute being cited has been repealed. If a statute has been repealed, then you must note that historical fact in the citation.
Another reason for citing session law, instead of a code, occurs when historical elements are important: the fact of enactment, amendments, or repeal are three example. A fourth reason can arise when the language of the code differs materially from the session law, and the code has not been enacted into positive law.
Since 1846, at least one volume of federal sessions laws has been published each year. Until 1957 federal statutes were designated by chapter numbers. Session law compilations are important research sources because they [do the following:]
(1) contain the exact text of the law as enacted;
(2) contain all the laws enacted during a particular legislative session, including private law and special laws (legislation directed at individuals or specific matters rather than general policies), budget provisions, effective date provisions, and other temporary provisions that are not codified.;
(3) make it possible to track changes in a statute from year to year, and
(4) form a permanent historical record of the law, enabling you to find even those laws that have been repealed. From Christina L. Kunz, et al., The Process of Legal Research 236 (3d ed. 1992)
Citing federal session laws (United States Statutes at Large)
Citing Rules and Regulations
[Bluebook rule 14]Code of Federal Regulations:
Federal Register: Among many other things, the Federal Register publishes rules and regulations before they are codified. The number before the abbreviated title of the Register is a volume number and the one after is a page number. If the Federal Register gives the information where the cited material is to appear in the C.F.R., then add that information within parentheses to the citation.
The Federal Register citations comprise these elements: (1) annual volume number; (2) abbreviation of name; (3) page number of cited material (usually a rule); (4) year of register publication.
Administrative Adjudications and Arbitrations: Use documentation techniques analogous to case law citations.
Here is an example from the National Labor Relations Board:
Trojan Transp., Inc., 249 N.L.R.B. 642 (1980).
Here is an example from the Federal Communications Commission:
In re Armstrong, 92 F.C.C.2d 491 (1982).
Arbitrations include within parentheses the name of the arbitrator if known.
Kroger Co. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters Local 539, 74 Lab. Arb. (BNA) 785 (1980) (Doering, Arb.).
Charles P. Ortmeyer, 23 Indus. Arb. 272 (1980) (Stern, Arb.).
Citing Rules:
[Bluebook rule 12.8.3]The rules themselves often give citation guides. The following are suggested for federal rules.
Citing Constitutions
[Bluebook rule 11]9. Likewise, if the constitutional provision being cited has been amended, then add one of two notations.
(A) Within parenthesis give a notation of the amendment along with the date.
U.S. Const. art. I., § 3, cl. 1 (amended 1913). or
(B) Cite in full the amending provision.
U.S. Const. art. I., § 3, cl. 1 (amended by U.S. Const. amend. XVII, § 1).
10. Cite constitutions that have been totally superseded by the year of its adoption.
Pa. Const. of 18XX, art. II, § 1.
Citing Secondary Authorities
Citing Encyclopedias
[Bluebook rule 15.7(a)]Main Encyclopedia volume
1. volume number; 2. Space; 3. abbreviation of title of encyclopedia (not underlined); 4. Space; 5. article name underlined; 6. Space; 7. section symbol; 8. space; 9. section number; 10. Space; 11. year of publication in parentheses; 12. period.
67 Am. Jur. 2d Robbery § 25 (1985).
Main Encyclopedia volume and supplemental pocket part
11. within parentheses: a. main volume date; b. ampersand with no space before or after; c. abbreviation for supplement [i.e., Supp.]; d. date of supplemen.
67 Am. Jur. 2d Robbery § 25 (1985 & Supp. 1993)
Only Encyclopedia supplemental pocket part
1. volume number; 2. space; 3. abbreviation of title of encyclopedia; 4, space; 5. article name underlined; 6. space; 7. section symbol; 8. space; 9. section number; 10. space; 11. within parentheses: a. abbreviation for supplement [i.e., Supp.]; b. date of supplement
67 Am. Jur. 2d Robbery § 25 (Supp. 1993)
Citing A.L.R. Annotations
[Bluebook rule 16.5.5]Main A.L.R. volume
1. Authors full name with first name first, followed by a comma and then a space;
2. word Annotations capitalized, followed by a comma and then a space;
3. full title of annotation itself, followed by a comma and then a space;
4. volume number followed by a space;
5. A.L.R. abbreviation followed by a space;
6. page number on which annotation begins followed by a space;
7. publication year in parentheses.
Lynn C. Cobb, Annotation, Robbery by Means of Toy or Simulated Gun or Pistol, 81 A.L.R.3d 1006 (1977).
Main A.L.R. volume and supplemental pocket part
8. within parentheses: a. main volume date; b. ampersand with no space before or after; c. abbreviation for supplement [Supp.]; d. date of supplement.
Lynn C. Cobb, Annotation, Robbery by Means of Toy or Simulated Gun or Pistol, 81 A.L.R.3d 1006 (1977 & Supp. 1993).
Citing a specific A.L.R. page or pages
6. (a) page number on which annotation begins followed by a comma and then a space;
6. (b) the page or pages cited followed by a space.
Lynn C. Cobb, Annotation, Robbery by Means of Toy or Simulated Gun or Pistol, 81 A.L.R.3d 1006, 1010-1012 (1977).
Citing Legal Treatises
[Bluebook rule 15]Single volume legal treatise
1. Author's full name, first name first, followed by comma and then a space (two authors should appear in the order in which they are listed on the publication. If more than two authors, use et al.)
2. Title of treatise in full, underlined, as appears on title page, but capitalize according to Rule eight (R.8); give subtitle only if particularly relevant.
3. Section or page number cited followed by a space; use section symbol if section is cited.
4. Year of publication within parentheses; precede by edition number if not first edition.
Wayne R. La Fave & Austin W. Scott, Jr., Criminal Law § 8.11 (2d ed. 1986)
Multivolume set of legal treatises
Put volume number followed by a space at very beginning.
2 Melville B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 7.26 (1992)
Citing Legal Periodicals
[Bluebook rule 16]Periodicals with consecutively numbered pages
1. Author's full name, first name first, followed by comma and then a space (two authors should appear in the order in which they are listed on the publication. If more than two authors, use et al. Follow rule 15.1.1).
2. Full title of article underlined (or italicized), followed by a comma and then a space.
3. Volume number followed by a space.
4. Law review name abbreviation (Table 13) followed by a space.
5. First page number of article followed by a space.
6. Year within parentheses.
Glifford S. Fishman, Electronic Tracking Devices and the Fourth Amendment: Knotts, Karo, and the Questions Still Unanswered, 34 Cath. U.L.Rev. 277 (1985)
Periodicals with nonconsecutively numbered pages, that is, separately paginated within each issue (Rule 16.3 & 16.4)
1. Author's full name, first name first, followed by comma and then a space.
2. Full title of article underlined, followed by a comma and then a space.
3. Name of periodical, followed by a comma and then a space.
4, Date of issue as it appears on the cover, followed by a comma and then a space.
5. Word at First page number of article.
6. First page number of article.
Philip Carrizosa, 9th Circuit Rules Toy Guns Used in Thefts 'Dangerous', L.A. Daily J., Jan 4, 1989, at 1.
Joan B. Kelly, Mediated and Adversarial Divorce: Respondents' Perceptions of Their Processes and Outcomes, Mediation Q., Summer 1989, at 71.
Signed and titled notes, comments, projects, etc., by students(Rule 16.5.1) Designation of genre (note) should appear before title of work to indicate it is student written.
Gary Garrigues, Note, United States v. Martinez-Jiminea: Use a Toy Gun, Go to Prison, 20 Golden Gate U.L.Rev. 1967 (1990)
Kathleen M. Conkey, Comment, Ninth Circuit Reveals Shocking Truth! No Protection for Public Figures Against Deliberate Fabrications by Media! A Comment on Masson v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 42 Rutgers L.Rev. 1133 (1990)
·
Citing a book:Elements of book citation: (1) volume number; (2) first initial and last name of author; (3) full main title as appears on title page, but not subtitle; (4) page, section, or paragraph of referenced material; (5) edition; (6) publication date.
Citing a legal dictionary:
Elements of dictionary citation:(1) Full name of dictionary; (2) page number of term; (3) edition of dictionary; (4) year dictionary published.
Citation Signals
Citation signals indicate how a writer views the relationship of an item cited to a proposal being discussed. If no signal is used, then the reader may assume that the citation supports the writer's position. The four most common signals follow. (From Wren, Christopher, G. and Jill Robinson Wren, The Legal Research Manual: A Game Plan for Legal Research and Analysis. Madison Wisconsin: A-R Editions, Inc., 1983.)
|
Signals: |
Explanation |
Example |
|
|
See Generally |
This signal indicates that the cited authority provides useful background information about a given point |
See generally Dresser, Ulysses and the Psychiatrists:, 16 Harvard. C.R.-C.L.L. Rev. 777 (1982) |
|
|
See, e.g., |
This signal indicates that the cited authority directly supports a proposition. It further indicates that other authorities also could have been cited for the same proposition, but no purpose would be served by citing them all because their citations would be duplicative. |
See, e.g., Bishop Processing Co. v. Davis, 213 Md. 465, 132 A.2d 445 (1957). |
|
|
Cf. |
This signal indicates that the cited authority states a proposition different format that stated by the person citing to the authority, but that the cited authority’s proposition is sufficiently analogous to lend support. |
Cf. 20 Am. Jur.2d Courts § 92 (1965) |
|
|
Contra |
This signal indicates that the cited authority contradicts a given point. |
Contra W. Prosser, Law of Torts § 34 at 180 (4th ed. 1971). |
|
U.S. Law Week published by Bureau of National Affairs
Supreme Court Bulletin published by Commerce Clearing House (CCH)
Federal Cases (F.Cas.) 1789-1880 contains both district and circuit courts opinions.
Federal Reporter (F.) 1880 to 1924 contains both district and circuit courts opinions.
Federal Reporter, Second Series (F.2d) 1924-1993 contains circuit court opinions.
Federal Reporter, Second Series (F.2d) 1924-1932 contains district court opinions.
Federal Reporter, Third Series (F.3d) 1993-present contains circuit court opinions.
Federal Supplement (F.Supp.) 1932-present contains selected district court opinions and US Court of International Trade opinions.
Federal Rules Decisions (F.R.D.) 1940-present contains selective lower federal court opinions, not in FR or Fsupp, which deal with procedural matters and proceedings of judicial conferences and an occasional speech or article on procedural law.
American Law Reports prior to 1969 had state and federal cases; now only 250 selected state decisions a year. ALR Federal comprises 150 federal decisions a year
Squib is one sentence summary of a principle of law
American Digest System
(1) Century Digest = 1658-1896
(2) Decennial digest = every 10 years or two every five; first = 1897-1906
(3) General Digest = current volumes
Federal Digests
Federal Digest 1754-1939
Modern Federal Practice Digest 1939-1961
Federal Practice Digest 2d 1961-1975
Federal Practice Digest 3d 1975-present
Statutes
Slip law = pamphlet with separate pagination or single sheet; official
Unofficial slip law is called quick text published by commercial houses
Session Laws = chronological order in separate yearly volumes
Note: U.S. Congress calls session laws Statutes at Large
Codes = arranged by subject matter
Pennsylvania Miscellanea
Citing Pennsylvania Courts
·
Illustrative citation of a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision (with parallel citations)Corabi v Curtis Publishing Co.,
441 Pa. 432, 273 A.2d 899 (1971).·
Illustrative citation of a Pennsylvania Superior Court decision (with parallel citations)Brody v Philadelphia Newspapers Inc., 281 Pa.Super. 588, 422 A.2d 625 (1980).
·
Illustrative citation of a Pennsylvania Trial Court of Original Jurisdiction:Karpathios v. Deardoff, 12 D.&.C.4th 22 (1991).
The third [federal] circuit [court of appeals purview] consists of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and the American Virgin Islands.
The federal district courts in Pennsylvania are located in three areas:
Eastern District of Pennsylvania(E.D.Pa.) meets at
Philadelphia, Allentown, Easton
Middle District of Pennsylvania (M.D.Pa.) meets at
Harrisburg, Scranton, Williamsport
Western District of Pennsylvania (W.D.Pa.) meets at
Pittsburgh, Erie, Johnston
Citing Pennsylvania Statutes
Bluebook
titles of Pennsylvania statutory authorities (You probably will notice that the Bluebook abbreviations in citations are longer than those used by most other sources.)XX Pa. Cons. Stat. § XX (19XX).
XX Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § XX (19XX).
XX Pa. Stat. Ann. titl. XX, § XX (19XX)
Parking Authority Law, Pa. Stat. Ann. titl. 53 § 342 (Purdon 1974 & Supp. 1990).
19XX Pa. Laws XXX
19XX Pa. Legis. Serv. XXX (Purdon)
XX Pa. Code § XX (19XX)
Pa.R.Crim.P. 4
Pa.R.C.P. No. 201
Pa.R.C.P. No. 51
Pa.R.A.P. 101
It is not necessary, of course, to use the full name of the volumes containing Pennsylvania session laws: Laws of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth Pennsylvania Passed at the Session of 1986 in the Two Hundred and Tenth Year of Independence together with Other Documents Relating to Actions by the General Assembly or Required by Law to be Published in the Laws of Pennsylvania more commonly know as the Laws of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania or as the Laws of Pennsylvania or even Pamphlet Laws.
Pennsylvania Session Law Citations: The somewhat abbreviated session style used by Purdon's does not use the "Act of" phrase, although the word "Act" clearly is appropriate when referring to the popular name of a statute. It is important to remember that the section number in a session citation is not the same as the section number in the code. When statutes at large are codified, new section numbers are assigned to the statutes.
1939, June 24, P.L. 872, No. 375, § 806.6.
In the style used by Purdon's, 1939 is the year the law was passed, 872 is the page number, 375 is the act number, and 806.6 is the section number of the session law, not of the section in the code. [You may have to supply the act number since some identifying sources leave it out in favor of the page number.]
You often hear persons refer only to an act number, such as Act 195. Well, the phrase Act 195 is of little value unless one knows the year Act 195 was passed. If the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed 200 acts for 150 years, then there would be 150 Act 195s. Therefore, even the briefest citation must include a year to be helpful.
Return to D.S. Campbell's home page