Lock Haven University Anti-Hazing Policy
Act 175 of the General Assembly makes hazing a criminal offense within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. "Hazing" is defined in the law as: Any action or situation which recklessly or intentionally endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or admission into or affiliation with any organization operating under the sanction of an institution of higher education. The term shall include, but not be limited to, any brutality of a physical nature, such as whipping, beating, branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to the elements, forced consumption of any food, liquor, drug or other substance, or any other forced physical activity which could adversely affect the physical health and safety of the individual, and shall include any activity which would subject the individual to extreme mental stress, such as sleep deprivation, forced exclusion from social contact, forced conduct which could result in extreme embarrassment, or any other forced activity which could adversely affect the mental health or dignity of the individual. For purposes of this definition, any activity as described in this definition upon which the initiation or admission into or affiliation with an organization is directly or indirectly conditioned shall be presumed to be "forced" activity, the willingness of an individual to participate in such activity notwithstanding.
Hazing is deemed criminal misconduct and is made a third degree misdemeanor, punishable by a year's imprisonment. 24 P.S. 5353 (Purdon's Leg. Service); 18 P.S. 1101. Colleges and universities are expressly authorized to suspend, expel, or fine students who engage in hazing, and to withhold grades and diplomas to compel payment of fines. 24 P.S. 5354(3) (Purdon's Leg. Service).
The object of
the law is to ensure that no student at a Pennsylvania college
or university, public or private, is subjected to physical or
mental harm as a condition of joining, affiliating, or holding
membership in fraternities, sororities,
Act 175 provides that no student can consent to being hazed. Any activity falling within the definition of hazing activities is considered to be a forced activity, subjecting the organization and its members to the full range of penalties. In compliance with Act 175 and in accordance with long-standing policy, Lock Haven University has the following regulation: All activities of student groups and organizations, including pledging and initiations, shall be conducted in such a way as not to embarrass or injure participants or in any way adversely reflect upon Lock Haven University. Hazing and one-way initiation rides are prohibited. Conducting pledging activities at strip mine sites are prohibited.
In general, the following acts would constitute violations of the university regulation on hazing:
Several factors need to be understood relative to violations of the university regulation. Firstly, the test for determining if an activity was abusive or humiliating does not rest solely on the reactions of the participants. If it is evident that such was the intent of the activity or the result of the activity, it would be hazing whether or not the participants believed the activity was hazing. Secondly, if continuation of pledging, initiation, or membership was contingent upon participation in an activity, that participation in effect coerced. Should the activity be disagreeable, objectionable, or embarrassing to a participant, it would be hazing. Thirdly, the consent of the participant has no effect upon the determination of the activity being recognized as hazing.
Additional guidelines for determining the hazing potential of an activity are:
The activity is liable to be harmful because it
involves improper or
The activity is liable to result in injury because
the intent is to create an
· The activity involves deliberate maltreatment of participants.
The activity is liable to be harmful due to
negligence or lack of
The activity would be degrading of participants
because it would subject
The activity involves something which the
participants would not freely
It should be remembered that university regulations are also violated by:
Activities which are dangerous, either by their
nature or the conditions
· Activities in which the possibility of injury to participants is evident.
organization found to have engaged in hazing may have its
official recognition permanently revoked. Any student who
participates in hazing may be fined, suspended, or expelled from
the university. Hazing is also a criminal