Introduction

Institutional Effectiveness

Educational Effectiveness

Institution-wide assessment                                  Back to Index

The System Accountability Plan (SAP) provides an evaluation of University effectiveness and efficiency as it relates to enhancing System values and standards of performance and achieving University goals.  Although some of the measures change each year, the System uses approximately 61 quantitative measures and qualitative reports to evaluate progress in areas such as student advancement (i.e., overall and minority retention rates and graduation rates, undergraduate student research, academic recognition), academic quality (i.e., degrees awarded, accreditations, faculty with terminal degrees, academic advising), productivity (i.e., credit hours/FTE faculty member, personnel ratio), diversity (i.e., number and percent of students, faculty, administrators, and executives from underrepresented groups) and instructional costs.  The System established targets and external benchmarks for the University using historical data and trend analysis.  University performance is compared to the targets, trends, and benchmarks.  Performance that falls below established targets necessitates corrective action. 

In addition to SAP, the University conducts other assessments that are considered to have institutional-wide impact.  In 1994, LHUP engaged in Continuous Improvement (CI) initiatives to assess and  improve efficiency and provide quality service.  Although many departments and programs plan to continuously improve by using the results of various assessments, CI process reviews stressed the importance of cross-functional teams of faculty, staff, or students to embrace quality initiatives that improve what we do.  The CI Quality Council formed to foster an environment conducive to CI, to solicit suggestions for improvement from campus constituents, and to monitor the progress of CI on campus. 

In addition to the CI Quality Council, faculty and staff have several other forums through which to voice concerns and provide feedback to the University Administration.  Open meetings, open forums for special issues, and other campus events provide opportunities for faculty and staff to provide feedback regarding satisfaction with the organizational structure, work processes, planning initiatives, and campus climate.  The following list of assessment activities includes the components of SAP and other University initiatives that are used for institution-wide assessment.


 

Area

Assessment Activities

Frequency of Assessment

Assessment Date

Planning and Assessment

 

All SPG

System Accountability Plan

o   Academic Quality

o   Student Achievement/Success

o   High-Need
Academic Programs

o   Economic Development

o   Resource Development and Utilization

o   Enhance planning and assessment activities

o    Increase distance education

o    Enhance international education

o    Enhance the living/learning environment

o    Implement plans for the Clearfield Campus

o    Increase enrollment

o    Foster a more diverse campus community

o   Degrees Awarded

o    Persistence rates

o    Accredited Programs

o    Graduation rates

o    Faculty Productivity

o    Distance Education Enrollments

o    Praxis passing rates

o    Internships

o    Associate Degrees Awarded

o    Diversity of
Freshmen Class

o    Diversity of
Student Body

o    Diversity of Faculty/Staff

o     Low Enrolled Programs

o     Enrollment Management

o      Personnel Ratio

o      Private Support

o      Instructional Cost per FTE Student

o      Faculty with
Terminal Degrees

Annual

June 2004

Institutional Research

Annual

Summer 2004

Planning and Assessment

 

All SPG

o   Student Activities

o   Faculty Workload

o   Background/Credential Checks

Ongoing

 

President’s Office
SPG 7

  • Cabinet

Monthly

September 2003

Council of Trustees
SPG 3

  • President’s Evaluation

Annual

August 2004

President’s Office/
Provost Office

SPG 3

  • Open Meetings
  • Open Forums

 

  • Meet and Discuss
  • Cabinet

Three/year
Ad Hoc based on special issues

Monthly
Monthly

 

Institutional Research
SPG 2

  • Faculty/student ratio,
    class size

Semi-annual

Fall 2003/Spring 2004

Planning and Assessment (Economic Development)

 

SPG 8

o   Grant Dollars

o    Business Consulting

o    Continuing Education

o    High-Need Programs

o    Collaborative partnerships

Annual

Annual

Annual

Annual

Annual



Annual

Every five years

June 2003

June 2003

June 2003

June 2003

June 2003



June 2003

August 2007

  Hit Counter as of 12/18/03        Back to Index
 

Hit Counter  as of 3/24/04