| |
|
Reading
Guidelines |
| |
| Critical reading is an important skill in history (and
in many other disciplines as well). As a student, you will be forced to
read things which may not be interesting but which nonetheless you must
understand. Exams in this course may require information taken from the
readings to complete. Here are some general guidelines to follow as you
read the articles for discussion. Always come prepared to discussion
classes and make certain to contribute to discussion!
Practical
Reading Advice: Reading a book, article, or essay carefully is a
difficult skill which requires practice to improve. Different students may
have their own style to help them comprehend readings. In general,
however, there are a few things to help you understand better.
- Find a place without distraction to read (constant
distraction will force you to lose track of your subject)
- Read slowly when necessary for maximum comprehension
(speed reading may seem efficient but only if your mind absorbs and
understands what you are reading)
- Take notes (highlighting is the least effective way
because it is passive and inefficient; you are best to write things out in a
separate notebook or computer document)
- Look up unfamiliar words (always have a dictionary
close at hand; don't be intellectually lazy and assume you know the meaning of
something -- look it up!)
- Pay attention to key terms used or key points of
argument (for instance, be able to explain what the title of the piece means,
among other things)
- Learn to summarize things in your own words (after
reading a paragraph or section, be able to tell yourself the point and
argument of that passage; if you don't know, you should follow the next
guideline.)
- Re-read sentences or paragraphs that you don't
understand (if you lost your focus or simply don't understand - reread the
section again; don't simply read on thinking the information is not important)
- Review your notes before coming to discussion (even
the most thorough reading begins to fade from memory over time; familiarize
yourself with the key points again before coming to discussion).
|
| |
|
Discussion
Guidelines |
| |
|
Discussions are a period in which students
teach and learn from each other based on critical reading of the same material.
Discussion leaders must be the most familiar with the material and should
challenge themselves to read and reread it carefully to guide student
participation. In general, a student should first read the material then
prepare a list of discussion questions or topics. Since discussions are
led by teams of students, they should decide how to divide questions or duties
between themselves. If both students do not seem equally prepared, the
grades of both will suffer.
Here are a list of general questions that all students
should consider after finishing a reading. They may form a basis for
discussions in class. IMPORTANT: Discussion
leaders should formulate questions in their own words and fashion them
specifically toward the reading of the day. Merely repeating these
questions suggests a lack of initiative and does not show proof of your own
understanding.
- What was the
subject of this reading?
- What did the author argue (the
thesis) about this subject? (much
more difficult but more important)
- Did the author summarize how historians have
interpreted this subject in the past? (this is called
historiography -- the
history of history so to speak)
- What
evidence did the author make use of to
reinforce his or her argument?
- What is the importance or
significance of this
subject?
- What key
terms or concepts did the author use?
- What were the
connections to
other themes
of lectures or previous readings?
Suggestions: Managing a
discussion is largely a matter of style, however, you may want to consider the
following. You may give some brief background to the discussion but try to
avoid summarizing the main points of the piece at the outset. Leave room
for students to offer their opinions. If you ask questions that are too
general or difficult, think of a way to divide the question into more easily
answerable parts. Ask questions in a series that slowly build toward a
fuller understanding. If students are unresponsive, press or choose
students to suggest possible answers. Have an open attitude that
encourages participation and even disagreement when it arises. Be ready to
follow up on points outside your prepared questions or cover material more
slowly if students show misunderstanding. Lastly, manage time wisely.
Leading discussions also means pushing conversation along to accomplish goals of
understanding the readings more fully. |
| |
|
Discussion
Paper Guidelines |
| |
| Format: For all discussion
periods indicated in red students are expected to
hand in a short paper (3-4 pages) summarizing the readings for that class.
All papers are due in class on the assigned day and may not be forwarded to the
instructor in any other way without permission. They should be typed,
double-spaced, in clearly legible 12-point font, with 1 inch margins. Your
name and the assignment title should appear on the top of the first page taking
as little room as possible. Number and staple pages together. No
title page, footnotes, etc are necessary.
Assignment: This paper
should contain a summary of the topic and thesis (argument) of the author as
discussed above. You should take care to address the author's use of
evidence and any historiographical information. If information builds upon
that of lectures and previous readings, make connections of these major themes
and interpretations. |
| |
|
Discussion
Schedule and Assignments |
| |
|
Date |
Day |
Topic |
Assignments |
Discussion Leaders |
|
Jan 22 |
M |
1: The
Emperor in the Tokugawa Era |
Wakabayashi,
“In Name Only |
Professor
Sandow |
|
29 |
M |
2: Urban
Society in the Meiji Restoration |
Smits,
“Shaking Up Japan” |
Karten, Erin M.
Johnson, Jennifer M. |
|
Feb 5 |
M |
3: The Real “Last Samurai” |
Research Question Due
Yates, “Saigo Takamori in the Emergence of Meiji Japan” |
Cummings, Quentin
Fletcher, Leonard E. |
|
9 |
F |
“Spirits of the
State: Japan’s Yasukuni Shrine” |
DOCUMENTARY and
reading: Antoni, “Yasukuni-jinja and Folk Religion” |
Professor
Sandow |
|
12 |
M |
4: The Meiji Era Popular Rights movement |
Draft Bibliography Due
Steele, “From Custom to Right” |
Baney, William E.,,IV
Long, Patrick D. |
|
19 |
M |
5:
Creating a National Religion |
Hardacre,
“Creating State Shinto” |
Prentice, Brian
P.
Myers, Amanda Marie |
|
26 |
M |
6: Sex
and the State |
Fruhstuck,
“Managing the Truth of Sex in Imperial Japan.” |
Hausammann,
Patrick B.
Rice, Andrew Paul |
|
Mar 5 |
M |
7: Race War in the Pacific |
Dower, “Race, Language, and War in Two Cultures” |
Sloan, Elayne M.
Strouphauer, Derek Michael |
|
26 |
M |
8: The
Emperor as Symbol |
Bix,
“Inventing the "Symbol Monarchy” |
Eisenhower, Mark
A.
Kozlowski, Christopher M. |
|
Apr 2 |
M |
9: The
Pacific War |
John Lynn,
"The Merciless Fight" |
Tegan, Kristen
E.
Titanski, Jennifer L. |
|
10 |
T |
10:
Postwar Black-markets |
Owen
Griffiths, "Need, Greed, and Protest In Japan's Black Market,
1938—1949" |
Hinaman, Thomas
S.,, III
Lange, Richard J. |
|
16 |
M |
11: War
Memory in Contemporary Japan |
Jeans,
“Victims or Victimizers?” |
Burton, Miranda
K.
Keller, Robin J. |
|
30 |
M |
12:
Modern Perspectives on the Emperor |
Fujitani,
“Electronic Pageantry and Japan's ‘Symbolic Emperor.’” |
Cummings, David
C.
Rinker, Stacey L.
Ellzy, Daryl Scott |
|