|

Social Psychology
Instructor: Susan Boland
Case Study 5.2
Adapted from a case study written by Erik Coats and
Robert S. Feldman in Feldman, R.S. & Regan, P.C. (1995). Social
Psychology: Student Workbook with Case Studies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
§
This case study assignment
requires that you apply the ideas presented in Chapter 9 of the textbook
and lecture. Read the case study carefully and answer the five questions
in detail. Follow the instructions for case study assignments in the
“Course Handouts”. A copy of the instructions is also on my web-page
http://www.lhup.edu/sboland/
·
Do NOT plagiarize! Avoid
quoting directing from the textbook -- write in your own words.
Information taken from the text, even if rewritten in your own words,
must be credited to or cited to the textbook authors or to lecture. See
the full case study instructions for more details about citing the text
and lecture as a source.
·
If you have any questions
regarding this assignment please ask.
Case Study 5.2: Three’s Company, Four’s
a Crowd
As the best man, Justin was giving
a toast to the newlyweds, Steve and Christine. After the toast Justin
continued to reminisce about how his relationship with his friends.
After all, if it hadn’t been for Justin, Steve and Christine would have
never have met.
Three years ago, Justin placed an
ad in the newspaper to find roommates to share his house. Justin had
recently moved to the city because of a new job, and hadn’t met many
people yet. He purchased a large house, and there was plenty of space
to have roommates, yet preserve Justin’s privacy at the same time.
One week after placing the ad
Justin rented the large room downstairs to Steve. Two weeks later
Christine rented the small room upstairs. A third room was rented to
another man named Frank.
Although Justin liked his new
roommates, he didn’t have much in common with them. Steve and Christine
were both college students at the local university, and were several
years younger than Justin. They both liked rock music, going to movies,
and were athletic. Justin, on the other hand, preferred a quieter
lifestyle of reading, listening to classical music, and going for
evening strolls. Despite these differences, Steve and Christine were
considerate roommates, and Justin enjoyed their company.
On the other hand, Frank didn’t
seem to fit in well in the household. He worked the night shift at a
local factory, so the others seldom saw him. They mostly encountered
the messes he left in the shared kitchen. His sardine and onion
sandwiches left an unpleasant, lingering smell in the kitchen. He also
smoked cigars which the three nonsmoking roommates disliked. Like the
other housemates, Frank also enjoyed music, but on his nights off he
turned up his favorite country and western radio station so loud that
the others had a hard time
sleeping. When after two months, Frank announced that he was moving in
with a buddy from work, the others felt relief.
The three roommates continued to
get along, but after about six months, it became clear that Steve and
Christine were becoming more than “just friends”. At first, it was
really mostly Christine pursing Steve. It was a good thing too, Justin
thought to himself. Steve was rather shy, but Christine was more
outgoing. But those differences were only superficial. Deep down,
Steve and Christine both valued the same things. They were both serious
about their college education, believed in hard work, while still taking
time out to enjoy life, and they both strongly valued loyal friendship.
And now today they were married!
Each answer is worth up to 5 points.
1) Justin decides to advertise for some
roommates to share his house. How might his
feelings of loneliness and his need
for affiliation relate to his decision to rent out
rooms? (Make sure to explain what
the terms mean.)
2) What is the mere exposure effect?
How might it have affected Steve and Christine’s
relationship? What about the
housemates’ relationship with Frank?
3) Is it true that “birds of a feather
flock together?” What is the role of similarity and
dissimilarity in Byrne’s model of
interpersonal attraction? Use this model to explain
the relationships that developed
among the four roommates: Justin, Steve, Christine
and Frank. (One way to approach
this question is to apply Byrne’s model from one
roommate’s (e.g., Christine)
perspective.)
4) a. If you had to guess what Steve
and Christine looked like, would you guess that one
was better looking than the
other, or that they were about the same in terms of
looks? What would the
matching hypothesis predict? (Be sure to explain what the
matching hypothesis is.)
b. Do “opposites attract”?
Explain the complementarity hypothesis. Give an example
of complementarity from
Christine and Steve’s relationship. Is there much
experimental support for the
complementarity hypothesis? If opposites attract,
why didn’t Christine fall for
Frank?
5) Christine initiated the relationship
with Steve. What might have happened if Steve
played hard-to-get? Discuss how a
person trying to initiate a relationship might to
respond to individuals based on how
selective those individuals are. (Base your answer
on relevant research.)
|